How SeatLogic publishes trustworthy planning content

1. Scope

This policy applies to SeatLogic blog posts, product workflow pages, documentation, and software comparison pages published on seatlogic.app.

2. Authors and Review

SeatLogic content is authored or reviewed by people directly involved in the product and the planning problems that inspired it. Robert and Lily contribute topic expertise drawn from the real wedding seating workflows that led to SeatLogic in the first place.

Product-specific claims are checked against current application behavior before publication or revision. Broad planning guidance is reviewed for practical usefulness, not just keyword coverage.

3. Source Standards

We aim to link source material for factual claims, market statistics, and third-party product statements whenever those claims materially influence a reader's decision.

• Primary or high-quality secondary sources are preferred.
• Statistics should be accompanied by source labels and direct links where possible.
• Unsupported superlatives are avoided.
• We separate first-party product knowledge from third-party market data.

4. Comparison Methodology

SeatLogic comparison pages are intended to explain workflow differences clearly, not to present other tools unfairly. We focus on scope, core use cases, and where each product category is strongest.

When a comparison includes feature claims about a third-party product, those claims should be grounded in publicly available documentation, product pages, or clearly identified first-party testing notes.

5. Updates and Corrections

We update pages when product behavior changes, when source-backed claims become outdated, or when we identify unclear language that could mislead a planner. Material updates should refresh the visible updated date.

If you spot an error or outdated claim, contact us at [email protected].